Memory issues are well-known in legal trials that involve the reliability of eyewitnesses in criminal cases. However, the relevance of memory to law extends far beyond that context. We describe the importance of, and concerns with, different facets of memory in a range of legal doctrine and processes. For example, in product liability cases, witness memory provides key evidence, but such civil cases differ in both the content of the memories and the procedures used to elicit them. In intellectual property cases, memory for trademarks and potential cryptomnesia (unconscious plagiarism) may be used in assessing liability. In contracts and negotiations, parties' memory may be useful, or not, when trying to make sense of the content of an agreement. Prospective memory, that is, remembering to do tasks in the future, is relevant to liability for actions as diverse as injury resulting from not following product warnings to forgetting a child in the backseat of a car. And neurologically impaired memory has consequences for attributions of blame and guilt. We end by providing brief reviews of some recent research on memory's involvement in investigations and in courtrooms (particularly in the U.S.) including: eyewitness testimony, confessions, consequences of pretrial publicity and expert testimony, and the effectiveness of jury instructions for both disregarding evidence and improving juror decision making. Throughout we try to illustrate relationships between the law and different facets of memory described in this Handbook.
Memory issues are well-known in legal trials that involve the reliability of eyewitnesses in criminal cases. However, the relevance of memory to law...
Evidence law controls what information will be admissible in court and when, how, and by whom it may be presented. It shapes not only the trial...
Professor Elizabeth Scott, the chief reporter of the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatement of Children and the Law, has often observed that the...
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, Justice Thomas’s majority opinion announced that the key to applying originalist methodology...
Forensic evidence has become a common tool in police investigations and a familiar form of evidence at trial. Forensic scientists are trained to...
Scott Lilienfeld warned that psychology’s ideological uniformity would lead to premature closure on sensitive topics. He encouraged psychologists to...
We examined how the presentation of risk assessment results and the race of the person charged affected pretrial court actors’ recommendations to...
Given that no two acts, events, situations, and legal cases are identical, precedential constraint necessarily involves determining which two...
The practice of assessing and adjudicating competence for criminal adjudication in the United States developed largely without assistance from the U.S...
Gun-related violence and suicide in the United States are serious public health problems that are concentrated among young adults, especially those...
Pretrial risk assessment instruments are used in many jurisdictions to inform decisions regarding pretrial release and conditions. Many are concerned...
The five articles in this special issue of FSI:Synergy were created to advance the understanding and adoption of insights from cognitive psychology...
Behavioral scientists enjoy vast methodological freedom in how they operationalize theoretical constructs. This freedom may promote creativity in...
Replies to comments by Cowan (see record 2022-57821-002), Vlasceanu et al. (see record 2022-57821-003), Tullett (see record 2022-57821-004), Marsh...
For over a decade, a battle has been raging in the trial courts of this country over something called the "reptile theory," often simply referred to...